|Vaccination's dangers don't fall evenly|
First, I recommend reading Jane Brody's August 10th column in the New York Times. It's about vaccines and, like all the others I've read about the controversy, it omits the fact that vaccines pose a higher risk for children with pre-existing neurological impairments than for healthy ones.
I thank Elizabeth Aquino for linking to the Pediatrics article which reports the results of a study of vaccinated children. Here is the abstract (link): the full-text of the article requires a subscription.
The researchers concluded that:
their results suggest that in most cases, genetic or structural defects are the underlying cause of epilepsy with onset after vaccination.... These results have significant added value in counseling of parents of children with vaccination-related first seizures, and they might help to support public faith in vaccination programs.The comment I sent Brody received only 5 recommends. I doubt it made the slightest dent in the conventional wisdom that our children - those with pre-existing neurological impairment - need no exemption from compulsory vaccination laws. But the comments were even more interesting than the article and you can still add yours to the 353 already up.
I also called the local organization which, along with several others, invited the CEO of Lumos, Georgette Mulheir, to speak at a conference held here in May. The lawyer of that organization, which assists cognitively disabled adults, told me that the conference primarily involved a project underway here to transfer 900 adults residing in closed institutions into homes within the community. The goal is to integrate them in every way, including employment.
|Classic image: Institutionalized baby care|
I was shocked to hear that the lawyer knew almost nothing about our country's large chain of closed institutions for people with disabilities. I've written several livid articles about that thriving, government-subsidized enterprise and she asked me to send the links (which I did).
So, Lumos' Mulheir came and left without learning about our entrenched system of institutionalization. What a squandered opportunity.
Now for another excerpt from Mulheir's speech: She gave an example of how de-institutionalization was effected in one country:
We found that in Bulgaria there are over 200 children with hydrocephalus. That's fluid on the brain. If it isn't treated, the head continues to grow and expand. The end is a painful death. In Bulgaria, the surgery these children needed was provided by the state but the drain, the device needed to provide the children with subsequent quality of life, was not. Consequently those children were institutionalized. Working with the government authorities in Bulgaria and Romania, we demonstrated that the cost of keeping a child in an institution far exceeds the cost of the drain these children require. That money could be spent on providing the drains in place of funding institutional care. The annual cost of institutionalization is 63,960 Euro while each drain costs only 1,500 Euro. Only after seeing the numbers were the authorities convinced to provide the drains and hundreds of children who underwent the surgery now live normal lives within the community. Another point in Bulgaria: children were dying of malnutrition in institutions at the rate of 3 per month. When the time allotted to meals was examined in one of the institutions, it was found that each child had on average one minute and 20 seconds to eat. Without intervention and change, many more children would have died there. Today the Bulgarian government is working on this. Some institutions still remain but many children have been transferred to the community and mortality has dropped to almost zero.